MMU COURSEWORK FEEDBACK

MMU COURSEWORK FEEDBACK

A checklist might be good for giving instant feedback after a presentation, while a detailed written report might work better for an essay. You may well find it useful to review this list whilst discussing types of feedback. The Coursework Receipting System CRS , takes a feed of approved submission dates for assessment elements from the Student Records System and provides students with bar-coded coversheets for tracking paper submission of those assessment elements. Commenting on a series of research studies on feedback, Chris Rust has observed that: It also gives the opportunity to provide generic feedback see Use generic feedback as well as individual feedback.

The university offers over 1, courses and qualifications, the majority of which have a strong professional bias. You also need to motivate them to continue to develop; they need to know what would have got them a first class mark. There may be practical reasons why this is difficult to do assignments submitted at the end of term, for instance, or low attendance, although returning assignments might have a good effect on that. If you write on student work then you do need to give the work back to students. Consulted about the design and content of assessments and involved in the approval of assessment elements.

Subject External Examiners are encouraged to provide a summary of issues for the Programme team to address. Assessment based on portfolios gives an opportunity to seek student reflection on feedback on assessed work and can be a useful part of the assessment profile of any programme.

It is not your responsibility to make the report available to the other students on your course, although you can direct them to it if you wish. MMU guidance on Submitting.

University Teaching Academy

Consulted about the design and content of assessments and involved in the approval of assessment elements. You could combine a marking grid with other types of feedback — there are some suggestions here.

If you had had difficulties coursewogk ascribing a mark then normal practice would be that you would have requested a second opinion from a colleague already. If no authorised extensions have been given then this could possibly be done within a few days of submission, if you have had time to look at a sample of submitted assignments and prepare an overview.

  HOMEWORK HANDYMAN ASHEVILLE

If you can’t return assignments in class, make sure that everyone knows when and how to collect the feedback; you can still reinforce its importance in class time, as well as make practical suggestions on how to use the feedback in future assignments.

Skip to content Menu Home. As a programme team, you may find it useful to make time in all units to review previous assignments and student performance systematically. The maximum number of summative assignments per student is now 8 per clursework, including examinations.

This might mean holding a meeting once marking is complete at the end of the academic year as most programme teams do in any case to produce some generic feedback across all assignments which will be discussed with classes at the feedbacl of the next year.

All students are entitled to feedback on their work, which should:.

mmu coursework feedback

The University has a clear policy on marks moderation ; project dissertations should always be second marked, but apart from these, second marking is done on a sampling basis. If you have more than one assignment in a unit, then you could offer marks in the second assignment for showing evidence of having acted on feedback from the first assignment – see Try allocating marks for acting on previous feedback in the Try something section.

MMU guidance on Setting.

External Examiners @ Manchester Metropolitan University Students’ Union

If so, how do I deal with the external examiner? What is an External Examiner?

mmu coursework feedback

They are normally academics or staff members at another UK university. Your Programme Leader is responsible for responding to the External Examiner regarding issues raised. Winter and Dye thought that a better engagement with students about feedback might be the key to an improvement. Sharing the marking across the team Providing some generic feedback to the group after having marked a sample of submissions, which highlights common strengths and weaknesses see section on generic feedback and model answers, below Carrying out peer marking on the submissions during teaching sessions so that students continue to think about the assignment while the tutor marking is completed Asking students to carry out a self-assessment so that they review the submission after a short break, again so that they continue to think about the assignment.

  JERUSALEM JEZ BUTTERWORTH COURSEWORK

If the student is not satisfied with this discussion, then he or she may need to be directed to the student complaints procedure. One way to show students that you think feedback is important is to set aside some class time to return it and to spend some time talking generally about what they should do with what you have just given back to them.

If they need to have their own copy to use with your feedback, make sure that they know this. Commenting on a series of research studies on feedback, Chris Rust has observed that: An estimate of the expected feedback date should then be published in the programme handbook along with the assignment submission deadline. Assignments which are not in printed form, such as artefacts or portfolios will need to be returned to students at some point.

The project also acted on a recommendation to focus more effort on the re-assessment period: The Coursework Receipting System CRStakes a feed of approved submission dates for assessment elements from the Student Records System and provides students with bar-coded coversheets for tracking paper submission of those assessment elements.

We are all familiar with the sight of uncollected assignments, probably marked under pressure of a deadline, and filled with helpful comments which may never be read. Making a photocopy of the work with your comments on it would normally be acceptable for the purpose of external moderation.

mmu coursework feedback

They advise academic staff on any changes proposed for your programme and they ensure that correct procedures have been followed on decisions made by the results and awards assessment boards. Having said this, most feedbaco would want to discuss this situation informally with students. You can find more information about External Examiners here.