Why humanitarian assistance is not a long-term solution in the OPT. You can publish your book online for free in a few minutes! Money does not even have to be given free though the food, pots and sheets were. Food security in the occupied Palestinian territory. People can then spend it according to their own priorities and needs, something which the aid world claims to support, and which is specifically mentioned in all its manuals and seminars. This became a problem in itself, as agencies had become used to the convenience of doing distributions inside a compound, and were reluctant to stop supporting people in the schools. The economic activity which the programme revived, based on carpenters and builders, sent a buzz through the whole town and demonstrated clearly what a difference the reintroduction of wages made to the economy.
New aid workers are warned by older and wiser colleagues never to give cash to beneficiaries.
It was no secret that they were going to sell the goods, and that the ensuing flood of cheap aluminium pots or plastic sheets would debase the local market and make things worse for small traders. Yet the aid community in Goma continued to hold to some moral high ground about giving cash.
The town is a busy commercial centre, a hive of economic activity and the main point of entry for goods from the outside world for much of eastern Congo. If we had given money There volxano abundant evidence from around the globe that post-disaster economies revive quickly if everyone has a little money to spend.
Goma after the Nyiragongo eruption. Why humanitarian assistance is not a long-term solution in the OPT. As aid responses go, Goma was mouny badly served. Complex justifications are developed.
Who could ever dtudy that someone had gone round twice, or that a family was represented at three different distribution points? This became a problem in itself, as agencies had become used to the convenience of doing distributions inside a compound, and were reluctant to stop supporting people in the schools.
Exactly the same problems of identification and duplication would have occurred. Nevertheless, it was abundantly clear that, after the eruption, the one thing the people of Goma needed was money.
Case study caxe a Volcanic eruption: Perhaps goods should have been given only to women, as at one point UNICEF had decided to do, or only to children, or only through churches. The case for cash: The humanitarian situation and response in the OPT.
The case for cash: Goma after the Nyiragongo eruption – ODI HPN
There was no immediate danger of starvation. Family kits, providing household items, were important and greatly needed, but everything in the kit could be bought in Goma. Markets quickly reopened nyirzgongo the eruption, and supplies of vegetables and fruit were soon re-established. Evacuation is nearly impossible as the Constructive margin in LEDCvolcanic ash prevents jets from taking off andthe runway is covered in a lava flow. You can publish your book online for free in a few minutes!
It also caused methane gas http: At least 45 people died and s are http: Cost-recovery in the health sector: A significant population did find it difficult and temporary camps grew up in some of the untouched schools and church compounds, which later had to be evacuated as a major effort was made to restart education. Volcno that was the one thing aid agencies would not, indeed could not, give.
Create your own flipbook. Developing micro-enterprise in refugee camps: Would the misuse of money in Goma have been any worse than the misuse of goods?
What volfano the Primary consequences of a volcanic18 hrs: While there may be genuine and well-founded fears around cash aid, there is only one real conclusion to be drawn: But perhaps the aid community could be radical and say that people, especially adults, have a right to misuse their cash.
It suffered an economic downturn for the next years as the tourist trade collapsed with few visitors. Nyiragongo In a major eruption from Mt Key Terms: Read the Text Version.