SEMINARIO CRITICAL THINKING BOCCONI

SEMINARIO CRITICAL THINKING BOCCONI

Valutare una conclusione basata su affermazioni condizionali. Apply arguments strategically in interpersonal communication. What is an argument? Assess a conclusion based on conditional statements. Explain a fact or event by using analogies. Draw a conclusion about reality, by imagining a situation that does not actually take place.

Courses offered in Academic Programs a. Apply arguments strategically in interpersonal communication. Valutare il ragionamento condizionale. Ragionare con analogie e spiegazioni. Come si mette in questione un argomento.

Usare gli argomenti per confutare altri argomenti.

Exam – Universita’ Bocconi

In this section Courses offered in Academic Programs a. Se continui a navigare sul sito, accetti espressamente cirtical loro utilizzo. Stabilire se un certo fatto possa essere considerate la causa di un altro fatto. Understand how arguments are used in human communication.

CLASS TIMETABLE CHANGES FOR THE COURSE 30527

Thinkingg se la spiegazione di un fatto sia convincente o no. Esercitazioni esercizi, banche dati, software etc. Draw a conclusion about reality, by imagining a situation that does not actually take place.

  DISSERTATION ETAT UNITAIRE DÉCONCENTRÉ

Reasoning with analogies and explanations. Identify the relationship between a cause and an effect. Each session of the seminar starts with a case study to be discussed in class, enhances a specific set of skills, and includes some tests, or experiments, to help students to understand the potential biases in reasoning and judgment. Use arguments to counter other arguments.

Valutare una conclusione basata su affermazioni condizionali.

30527 – SEMINARIO DI CRITICAL THINKING / CRITICAL THINKING SEMINAR

Ragionare con i condizionali. Face-to-face lectures Exercises exercises, database, software etc.

How to challenge an argument. Capire come gli argomenti sono impiegati nella comunicazione umana. Determine whether the explanation of a fact is convincing. This is done by considering the characteristics of these patterns, their diverse applications, and the psychological biases that affect human reasoning.

Determine under what conditions an argument is sound. Spiegare un fatto o un evento usando analogie. Ragionare con analogie e spiegazioni.

Explain a fact or event by using analogies. Valutare la rilevanza di una situazione controfattuale nella deliberazione. Courses offered in Academic Programs a. Come si mette in questione un argomento.

  DPS MATHURA ROAD HOLIDAY HOMEWORK 2015

Predict an event based on existing information. Evaluate the relevance of a counterfactual situation in decision-making.

seminario critical thinking bocconi

Choose the proper argument to counter other arguments in reasoning. Ragionare con le cause. Identificare la relazione tra una causa e un effetto. Determine whether a fact can be considered the cause of another fact. Apply arguments strategically in interpersonal communication.

CLASS TIMETABLES – Universita’ Bocconi

What is an argument? BIEF 1 credits – I sem.

seminario critical thinking bocconi

Identify the structure of an argument.